Before attempting workarounds consider whether Citus is appropriate for your situation. Citus’ current version works well for real-time analytics use cases. We are continuously working to increase SQL coverage to better support other use-cases such as data warehousing queries.
Citus supports most, but not all, SQL statements directly. Its SQL support continues to improve. Also many of the unsupported features have workarounds; below are a number of the most useful.
Subqueries in WHERE¶
A common type of query asks for values which appear in designated ways within a table, or aggregations of those values. For instance we might want to find which users caused events of types A and B in a table which records one user and event record per row:
select user_id from events where event_type = 'A' and user_id in ( select user_id from events where event_type = 'B' )
Another example. How many distinct sessions viewed the top twenty-five most visited web pages?
select page_id, count(distinct session_id) from visits where page_id in ( select page_id from visits group by page_id order by count(*) desc limit 25 ) group by page_id;
Citus does not allow subqueries in the WHERE clause so we must choose a workaround.
Workaround 1. Generate explicit WHERE-IN expression¶
Best used when you don’t want to complicate code in the application layer.
In this technique we use PL/pgSQL to construct and execute one statement based on the results of another.
-- create temporary table with results do language plpgsql $$ declare user_ids integer; begin execute 'select user_id' ' from events' ' where event_type = ''B''' into user_ids; execute format( 'create temp table results_temp as ' 'select user_id' ' from events' ' where user_id = any(array[%s])' ' and event_type = ''A''', array_to_string(user_ids, ',')); end; $$; -- read results, remove temp table select * from results_temp; drop table results_temp;
Workaround 2. Build query in SQL client¶
Best used for simple cases when the subquery returns limited rows.
Like the previous workaround this one creates an explicit list of values for an IN comparison. This workaround does too, except it does so in the application layer, not in the backend. It works best when there is a short list for the IN clause. For instance the page visits query is a good candidate because it limits its inner query to twenty-five rows.
-- first run this select page_id from visits group by page_id order by count(*) desc limit 25;
Interpolate the list of ids into a new query
-- Notice the explicit list of ids obtained from previous query -- and added by the application layer select page_id, count(distinct session_id) from visits where page_id in (2,3,5,7,13) group by page_id
INSERT INTO ... SELECT¶
Citus does not support directly inserting the results of a query into a distributed table. One workaround is to use two database connections to stream the query results to master and then distribute them to the shards.
psql -c "COPY (query) TO STDOUT" | psql -c "COPY table FROM STDIN"
This does incur network cost. If this workaround is too slow please contact Citus Data support. We can assist you in parallelizing the table insertion across all workers using a more complicated technique.
Citus does not yet support SELECT DISTINCT but you can use GROUP BY for a simple workaround:
-- rather than this -- select distinct col from table; -- use this select col from table group by col;
JOIN a local and a distributed table¶
Attempting to execute a JOIN between a local and a distributed table causes an error:
ERROR: cannot plan queries that include both regular and partitioned relations
In Citus Community and Enterprise editions there is a workaround. You can replicate the local table to a single shard on every worker and push the join query down to the workers. Suppose we want to join tables here and there, where there is already distributed but here is on the master database.
-- Allow "here" to be distributed -- (presuming a primary key called "here_id") SELECT master_create_distributed_table('here', 'here_id', 'hash'); -- Now make a full copy into a shard on every worker SELECT master_create_worker_shards( 'here', 1, (SELECT count(1) from master_get_active_worker_nodes())::integer );
Now Citus will accept a join query between here and there, and each worker will have all the information it needs to work efficiently.
Citus Cloud uses PostgreSQL replication, not Citus replication, so this technique does not work there.
Data Warehousing Queries¶
When queries have restrictive filters (i.e. when very few results need to be transferred to the master) there is a general technique to run unsupported queries in two steps. First store the results of the inner queries in regular PostgreSQL tables on the master. Then the next step can be executed on the master like a regular PostgreSQL query.
For example, currently Citus does not have out of the box support for window functions on queries involving distributed tables. Suppose you have a query with a window function on a table of github_events function like the following:
select repo_id, actor->'id', count(*) over (partition by repo_id) from github_events where repo_id = 1 or repo_id = 2;
You can re-write the query like below:
create temp table results as ( select repo_id, actor->'id' as actor_id from github_events where repo_id = 1 or repo_id = 2 );
select repo_id, actor_id, count(*) over (partition by repo_id) from results;
Similar workarounds can be found for other data warehousing queries involving unsupported constructs.
The above query is a simple example intended at showing how meaningful workarounds exist around the lack of support for a few query types. Over time, we intend to support these commands out of the box within Citus.